CricketAdviser.com is a professional cricket media platform built on editorial discipline, factual accuracy, and structured sports journalism.
We publish content for a cricket audience that values analysis over noise and data over opinion without evidence.
We are selectively open to contributions from qualified cricket writers, analysts, statisticians, and informed journalists who can meet our editorial standards and add genuine value to our readers.
Write For Us
If that describes you, this page outlines what we accept and how to submit.
Topics We Accept
All submissions must fall exclusively within the scope of cricket. We do not accept general sports content, lifestyle pieces, or articles with no direct cricket relevance.
- Match Analysis — Pre-match tactical previews and post-match breakdowns covering team selection decisions, pitch and conditions assessment, key matchups, and strategic observations across Test, ODI, and T20 formats.
- League and Tournament Previews — Coverage of IPL, PSL, BBL, CPL, The Hundred, SA20, and other recognized domestic and franchise competitions. Articles must go beyond surface-level previews and offer structured analytical content.
- Statistics Breakdown — Data-driven articles examining career performance trends, format comparisons, head-to-head records, bowling and batting analytics, and milestone analysis. All statistical claims must be sourced from verifiable databases.
- Tactical Strategy — In-depth examination of team strategies, batting orders, bowling rotations, field placements, powerplay approaches, and death-over tactics. Tactical articles must demonstrate working knowledge of cricket strategy at a competitive level.
- Opinion Columns — Evidence-based editorial opinion on selection decisions, tournament formats, cricket board policy, player form, and the broader direction of the sport. Opinion must be clearly presented as such and supported by factual context rather than assertion alone.
- Historical Features — Long-form articles documenting landmark matches, forgotten records, career retrospectives, and significant moments in cricket history. Historical content must be thoroughly researched and factually accurate throughout.
Quality Standards
CricketAdviser.com does not publish content that reads like a draft.
Every submitted article must meet publication-ready standards before it will be considered for editorial review.
Writing must be journalistic in tone — structured, precise, and analytical.
Emotional framing, dramatic storytelling, and excessive use of superlatives are not consistent with our editorial voice.
Arguments must be supported by data, documented records, or verifiable evidence.
Vague claims, generalized assertions, and opinions presented without factual grounding will be returned or rejected.
Contributors must demonstrate genuine knowledge of the subject matter. Surface-level familiarity with cricket terminology is not sufficient.
Articles that lack analytical depth, factual specificity, or editorial structure will not meet our publication threshold regardless of writing quality.
Original Content Requirement
CricketAdviser.com publishes only original, exclusive content.
Every article submitted must be written specifically for this platform and must not have been published — in full or in substantial part — on any other website, blog, newsletter, or digital platform before submission.
AI-generated content submitted as original human writing will not be accepted.
Content that has been substantially rewritten from existing published articles will be treated as derivative and rejected. Plagiarism in any form results in permanent exclusion from future submissions without exception.
By submitting an article to CricketAdviser.com, the contributor confirms that the content is entirely their own original work and that it does not infringe upon the intellectual property rights of any third party.
Editorial Review Process
Submitted articles go through a structured editorial review before any publication decision is made.
- Stage 1 – Pitch Screening: All contributors must submit a pitch before writing a full article. Pitches are reviewed for topic relevance, editorial fit, and analytical angle. Pitches that do not align with our content scope are declined at this stage.
- Stage 2 – Full Article Review: Approved pitches are invited to submit a complete article. The editorial team assesses the submission for factual accuracy, analytical quality, writing standard, source credibility, and formatting compliance.
- Stage 3 – Revision Request: Where an article demonstrates genuine editorial merit but requires corrections or improvements, the contributor will be contacted with specific revision notes. One revision round is offered per submission. Articles that do not meet standards after revision will not be published.
- Stage 4 – Publication: Accepted articles are scheduled for publication in accordance with our content calendar. Contributors are notified once their article is live on the platform.
Review timelines vary based on submission volume. Contributors should allow up to seven business days for an initial response to their pitch.
Formatting Guidelines
All submitted articles must follow these formatting requirements. Non-compliant submissions will be returned before editorial review begins.
- Word count must fall between 900 and 1,800 words, depending on content type. Statistical and historical features may extend beyond this range where the depth of content justifies it.
- Articles must include a clear headline, structured subheadings, and short paragraphs of no more than four lines.
- Statistical data must be presented in table format where numerical comparison is involved.
- All factual claims must be accompanied by source references within the article or submitted alongside the article for editorial verification.
- Avoid excessive keyword repetition, over-optimized anchor phrases, or any formatting that prioritizes search engine manipulation over readability.
- Submit articles as clean text documents or Google Docs. Do not submit PDF files or heavily formatted Word documents that complicate editorial review.
Author Bio Policy
Accepted contributors may include a brief author bio of no more than 50 words at the end of their published article.
The bio may include your name, professional background, and a single link to a personal website, portfolio, or professional social media profile.
Author bios must not function as promotional copy for commercial services, brands, or third-party platforms.
Bios containing excessive commercial links, keyword-stuffed descriptions, or misleading credentials will be edited or removed at the editorial team’s discretion.
CricketAdviser.com does not guarantee permanent retention of contributor bios and reserves the right to update or remove author information in line with editorial policy changes.
How to Submit Your Pitch?
Do not submit a full article without prior pitch approval. Send a concise pitch of 100–150 words outlining your proposed topic, the specific analytical angle you intend to take, the data or sources you plan to reference, and a brief description of your background in cricket writing or journalism.
Pitches that align with our editorial standards will receive a response within five business days. Approved pitches will be invited to submit a full article with specific formatting and sourcing guidance.
Submit your pitch to: businessbuddykb@gmail.com
Use the subject line: CA Contributor Pitch – [Your Proposed Topic]
A Final Note
CricketAdviser.com is a selective platform. We prioritize editorial integrity over output volume. Contributors who bring verifiable cricket expertise, disciplined writing, and a genuine commitment to accuracy are the kind of voices this platform is built to amplify.
If that is you, we look forward to your pitch.
